After exhaustive tests experts have just declared the so-called ‘Isleworth Mona Lisa’ as Leonardo Da Vinci’s original version of the famous ‘Mona Lisa’ now in the Louvre in Paris.
David Feldman, vice-president of the Mona Lisa foundation, an international group set up to demonstrate the painting’s authenticity said, “When we add these new findings to the wealth of scientific and physical studies we already have, I believe anyone will find the evidence of a Leonardo attribution overwhelming.”
Much of this new evidence was provided by Italian geometrist Alfonso Rubino. He had made extended studies of the geometry of Leonardo’s ‘Vitruvian Man’. When he compared his findings with the geometry of the ‘Isleworth Mona Visa’ he was convinced that both paintings were by the same artist.
Carbon dating tests on the painting by the Federal Institute of Technology in Switzerland also confirmed that its canvas was almost certainly manufactured between 1410 and 1455, refuting claims that the painting was a late 16th century copy.
The ‘Isleworth Mona Lisa’ is so called because it was kept in Isleworth by art connoisseur Hugh Blaker who found it in a country house in Somerset in 1913.
For the full background story please read The Isleworth Mona Lisa published by the St Margarets Community Website on 4th October 2012.
– from Martyn Day
Comments
Когда был в Париже в 2005г., Ñ Ð½Ðµ мог не поÑетить Лувр. Ðо в Лувр пришÑ'л Ñо звукозапиÑывающей теÑ...никой, которую любезно предоÑтавили французы. ÐашÑ'л <<Мону Лизу>> и Ñтал запиÑывать звуковой фон, Ñоздаваемый многочиÑленными поÑетителÑми, пришедшими поÑмотреть на шедевр. Логика была проÑта. Позволю Ñебе отметить, что любой шедевр обладает ÑвойÑтвом выÑокоÑтруктурированного информационного полÑ. Человек - Ñто тоже, в Ñвоей оÑнове, Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÐµÐ²Ð°Ñ Ñтруктура. ПроиÑÑ...одит контакт двуÑ... полевыÑ... Ñтруктур - человека и шедевра. Ð' Ñтом, вероÑтно, Ñила иÑкуÑÑтва. Те звуки, которые издавали люди, наÑ...одÑÑÑŒ в поле шедевра(разговоры, шарканье ног и др.), были очень ценны Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ñ, они коррелÑтивно были ÑвÑзаны Ñ Ð½Ð¸Ð¼. Подвергнув Ñти запиÑи Ñложнейшей транÑформационной обработке, мне удалоÑÑŒ получить Ñовершенно невероÑтные звучаниÑ. МногиÑ... они приводили в шок, - в ÑтиÑ... звукаÑ... наблюдалаÑÑŒ чÑ'Ñ‚ÐºÐ°Ñ Ð¸Ð´ÐµÐ½Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ„Ð¸ÐºÐ°Ñ†Ð¸Ñ Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ñ€Ñ‚Ñ€ÐµÑ‚Ð¾Ð¼ <<Моны Лизы>>. Подобные запиÑи Ñ Ñделал и у знаменитой Ñкульптуры Ð'енеры. Ð' результате, на оÑнове ÑтиÑ... запиÑей, у Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ñ Ñ€Ð¾Ð´Ð¸Ð»Ð¾ÑÑŒ три Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ð¸Ð·Ð²ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ - <<Ð-нание>>, <<Поток>> и <<Общение>>. studiomusicnew.blogspot.com
MIHAIL on 2013-02-17 08:23:22 +0000This is what Microsoft Translator offered as an interpretation...!
When I was in Paris in 2005, I could not fail to visit the Louvre. But in the Louvre came with the recording equipment, which kindly donated. Found the "Mona Lisa" and began recording the audio background created by the many visitors who came to see the masterpiece. The logic was simple. Let me point out that any masterpiece has the property of fine-grained information field. Man is, at its core, the field structure. Contact is made two-person field structures and masterpiece. This is probably the power of art. Those sounds that make people in the masterpiece (conversations, shuffling their feet, etc.), were very valuable to me, they were associated with the property. Subjecting these records complex transformational processing, I managed to get some incredible sound. Many of these have led to the shock-in these sounds were clear identification with the portrait of the "Mona Lisa." Such records I made in the famous sculpture of Venus. As a result, on the basis of these records, I have had three productions-"knowledge", "stream" and "communication".
Everybody clear on this?
Compost King on 2013-02-19 16:46:25 +0000Add a comment